Letter to the Editor: An Improved Bikeway Can Be a Tiny Step Toward Fighting Climate Change

~Submitted by Ken Larson

I heard a wrong-headed argument the other night at the public meeting regarding the extension of the Minuteman Bikeway. Many who spoke against paving the extension cited concerns over the natural environment. “Nature is endangered, not asphalt.” or words to that effect. The purpose of expanded non-automotive infrastructure is to make the use of walking and biking for daily transportation easier and safer. To defend nature and counteract the reality of climate change, a concerted move away from using automobiles is paramount. Creating an improved bikeway is one tiny step toward that goal. Creating a small improvement to bicycle transportation isn’t going to make much difference. But as more people recognize that getting out of our cars is THE biggest thing we can do as individuals to curtail climate change and its destruction of the world the sense of bikeways is obvious. The day will come when we will chuckle at our reluctance to create pathways for walking and bicycling. Of course, we could bury our heads in the sands of a leafy path and enjoy a tranquil walk while the world burns to ignore our real responsibility to change our car-loving ways.


The opinions expressed in Letters to the Editor are those of the writer, not The Bedford Citizen.


Keep our journalism strong! Support The Citizen Journalism Fund today. Contact The Bedford Citizen: editor@thebedfordcitizen.org or 781-430-8827

Share your enthusiasm for this article!

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James Walsh
3 months ago

Has there been a study done of traffic on this particular section to prove that it’s use will increase in a way that takes automobile commuters off the road? I’d love to see the data. Also I’m unsure why it can’t be used right now for that purpose as there’s a path there already?

Tim Bennett
3 months ago
Reply to  James Walsh

It’s always funny to me when opponents of the bikeway both minimize the benefits of taking care of the road by claiming that few new people will use the trail while at the same time others are claiming that too many people will use the trail to the point where it is unsafe (a baseless accusation given the design of the new trail, which will include stone dust shoulders for walkers).

Rebecca Neale
3 months ago
Reply to  James Walsh

Right now, the path can only be used in certain conditions. The proposed improvements will allow people to use it — in lieu of cars — for more of the year. Whatever daily traffic the path receives now, it will receive at least that same amount of traffic after the improvements, for many more months of the year.

Elizabeth
3 months ago
Reply to  Rebecca Neale

It is hard to understand the argument that paving the trail is to discourage car usage when the design includes a parking lot. As this becomes a commuting route from some will it be a driving destination for others?

Similarly, have we figured out how many cars need to come off the road much to off set the environmental impact of construction needed to create this trail?

It’s wonderful we live an environmentally conscious community. Perhaps the millions of dollars being used towards this project could be used towards another project (either local or state) to fight climate change.

About

The Bedford Citizen informs and engages the Bedford, MA, community through reporting news of local significance, promoting local events, fostering connectivity, and encouraging participation.

Contributors

Mike Rosenberg can be reached at mike@thebedfordcitizen.org, or 781-983-1763

Subscribe

* indicates required
Email Option: Choose one or both

Copyright © 2023 , The Bedford Citizen All Rights Reserved
Website by Paula Gilarde
For permission to reuse content, please email editor@thebedfordcitizen.org

4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x